0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
here's the exchange between pecker and trump's attorney emil beauvais. beauvais said so if this story was true, the doorman's story, you were going to run it, correct? pecker says yes, because you had a fiduciary obligation to do that, right? says beauvais pecker says that is correct. but they said it would have made business sense to put it mildly to run such an article if it was true, correct. twitch pecker replied, yes. now, we should point out in testimony earlier this week, pecker did testify under oath that if he ran the story, it would have been after the election which makes the argument that this was to protect trump going into the election. but as soon as the election was over, pecker would have run that doorman's story because it would have been in his words, extremely popular or not his exact words. but he said it would've been extremely popular among the national enquirer audience back with the panel joining us as well as barry levine, former executive editor of the national enquirer. barry, i'm wondering, i'm a, you know, david pecker obvio
here's the exchange between pecker and trump's attorney emil beauvais. beauvais said so if this story was true, the doorman's story, you were going to run it, correct? pecker says yes, because you had a fiduciary obligation to do that, right? says beauvais pecker says that is correct. but they said it would have made business sense to put it mildly to run such an article if it was true, correct. twitch pecker replied, yes. now, we should point out in testimony earlier this week, pecker did...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
>> well, wolf defense attorney emile beauvais, questioning david pecker on the cross-examination about the negative articles national enquirer was printing about donald trump's rivals. so the clintons, here's some of that transcript from the testimony in court. the defense attorney, let's talk a little bit about what with said during the august 2015 meeting you set on your direct that there was discussion about bill and hillary clinton, correct? yes. >> and at the time of this meeting, august 2015, the national enquirer was already running stories about bill and hillary clinton, correct? yes. >> that was going on before the meeting, right? >> that's correct. >> and that was because you had made a business decision that it was good for the national enquirer to run those stories, correct? >> i did beauvais then goes on to ask him so before the august 2015 meeting, you made a decision that it made sense for ami to run articles about bill and hillary clinton, right? yes. and those articles were negative, right? yes. so it was easy for you to say during the august 2015 meeting that you woul
>> well, wolf defense attorney emile beauvais, questioning david pecker on the cross-examination about the negative articles national enquirer was printing about donald trump's rivals. so the clintons, here's some of that transcript from the testimony in court. the defense attorney, let's talk a little bit about what with said during the august 2015 meeting you set on your direct that there was discussion about bill and hillary clinton, correct? yes. >> and at the time of this...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
here's the exchange between pecker and trump's attorney emil beauvais pecker did testify under oath that if he ran the story, it would have been after the election, which makes the argument that this was to protect trump going into the election. but as soon as the election was over, pecker would have run doorman's story because it would have been in his words, extremely popular or not his exact words. but he said it would've been extreme poplar among the national enquirer audience back with the panel joining us as well as barry levine, former executive editor of the national enquirer. barry, i'm wondering, you know, david pecker, obviously, well, you worked with the enquirer for a long time. you had some involvement with that doorman's story. how do you what do you make of him as a witness? >> well, listen, i was there anderson for 17 years. i was actually the first editorial higher for david pecker back in 1999 it's certainly troubling to be to be watching this unfold in thinking back to the great years of breaking so many great stories, john edwards let's tiger woods, jesse jackson's p
here's the exchange between pecker and trump's attorney emil beauvais pecker did testify under oath that if he ran the story, it would have been after the election, which makes the argument that this was to protect trump going into the election. but as soon as the election was over, pecker would have run doorman's story because it would have been in his words, extremely popular or not his exact words. but he said it would've been extreme poplar among the national enquirer audience back with the...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
trump's attorney, emil beauvais, used his time cross-examining pecker to show how the mutually ben relationship between him and trump went back almost two decades before the 2016 election. he confirmed with pecker that he had been giving trump a heads-up about negative stories during that time, bove as pecker if it was standard operating procedure for media to work with politicians, including sometimes to win elections pecker replied, yes. >> today was breathtaking. this room. he went on, he was breathtaking and amazing testimony. before court, trump commented on pecker's testimony at a stop at a midtown construction site. prosecutors cited his words to the judge on thursday as one of many violations of his gag order not to discuss witnesses in the case. >> how are you a lot of david testimony so far been very nice and he's been david been very nice and nice guy now the judge has set a hearing for wednesday to hear additional arguments over whether donald trump did violate that gag order tomorrow. >> david pecker will be back on the stand. trump's lawyers will continue to cross-examine him. tha
trump's attorney, emil beauvais, used his time cross-examining pecker to show how the mutually ben relationship between him and trump went back almost two decades before the 2016 election. he confirmed with pecker that he had been giving trump a heads-up about negative stories during that time, bove as pecker if it was standard operating procedure for media to work with politicians, including sometimes to win elections pecker replied, yes. >> today was breathtaking. this room. he went on,...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
beauvais, who is it was an interesting, interesting q&a in this back-and-forth with emil bove vein who is a defense attorney for mr. trump pecker acknowledged that negative press for trump's foes was generally good for business pecker said that if the false door man allegations had been true, he would have run the story after the election beauvais elicited from pecker that catch and kill. the term catch and kill buying a story in order to not run it so that it doesn't run anywhere else to protect mr. trump in this case, allegedly, tkatchenko was not discussed at the august 2015 meeting? the defense elicited from packer that he wanted nothing to do with the stormy daniels allegations and the defense made sure to spell out for the jurors that the karen mcdougal deal was reviewed by an election law attorney, jim. do any of these standout to you as important? bits of information for the defense of donald trump for the defense, i would say, you know, in hopefully you set this up an opening statement, but you need to just kinda pound home that were not fighting every single fact that moves i
beauvais, who is it was an interesting, interesting q&a in this back-and-forth with emil bove vein who is a defense attorney for mr. trump pecker acknowledged that negative press for trump's foes was generally good for business pecker said that if the false door man allegations had been true, he would have run the story after the election beauvais elicited from pecker that catch and kill. the term catch and kill buying a story in order to not run it so that it doesn't run anywhere else to...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
emil beauvais, the defense attorney, says, this relationship that you had with president trump, this mutually beneficial relationship, you had similar relationships with other people, right? david pecker it says, i did. meaning that there were other people for what you would provide a heads up if there was a potentially negative story, correct? becker says, yes, beauvais and other people that you would promote the national enquirer because it was good and it was good for it's good for you and good for them, right? pecker says, yes, beauvais. and then included celebrities, right? packer? yes. and most celebrities on a positive treatment and i'll publications, right pecker, they do. and you had a relationship like this with other politicians, correct? pecker says, yes. and you are aware that many politicians work with immediate and tried to promote their image, right? pecker says, yes, and promote their brand. pecker says yes to facilitate their campaign, correct? pecker says yes s standard operating procedure as you understand it, correct? david pecker says yes. and in fact that anoth
emil beauvais, the defense attorney, says, this relationship that you had with president trump, this mutually beneficial relationship, you had similar relationships with other people, right? david pecker it says, i did. meaning that there were other people for what you would provide a heads up if there was a potentially negative story, correct? becker says, yes, beauvais and other people that you would promote the national enquirer because it was good and it was good for it's good for you and...
0
0.0
Apr 26, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
trump attorney emil beauvais, bringing up the phrase national enquirer gold the defense now starting its re-cross of david pecker, still much more to come on cnn or special coverage continues right after this live from the nation's capital, one of the most unforgettable nights in dc, the sworn-in will read back here again they didn't biden and comedian collin joseph headline the white house correspondents dinner live tomorrow at seven eastern on cnn doug, hello, ghostbusters it's duck of doggedly moon we help people customize and save hundreds on car insurance with liberty mutual anyway we got a bit of a situation here sure i can only pay for what you need those clusters frozen empire in theaters now okay, everyone our mission is to provide complete balanced nutrition or strength and energy ensure with 27 vitamins and minerals nutrients for me let me help ensure complete with 30 grams of protein zehr take allergy relief works fast. >> it lasts a false hours. so dave can be deliverer, dance okay. dave, let's be more than our allergies seize the de with zyrtec he there, brenda. it's ca
trump attorney emil beauvais, bringing up the phrase national enquirer gold the defense now starting its re-cross of david pecker, still much more to come on cnn or special coverage continues right after this live from the nation's capital, one of the most unforgettable nights in dc, the sworn-in will read back here again they didn't biden and comedian collin joseph headline the white house correspondents dinner live tomorrow at seven eastern on cnn doug, hello, ghostbusters it's duck of...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
you pronounce emil and they told me me all but i forgot to ask about beauvais. all right. and any case just so you know what's going on right now. so the assistant mr. good job steinglass is objecting and getting into the objection. they had about bove a's line of questioning when it came to david pecker steinglass is right now arguing that bobi's questions about the fbi interview were quote improper and left the jury with a miss impression. steinglass objecting to beauvais trying to seemingly undermine the memory at the very least, if not the credibility of david pecker, which is what you would expect a defense attorney, i to do i suppose kara scannell right. >> i mean, you see this all the time in cross-examination, they tried to bring up notes from an fbi interview or from grand jury testimony, and then try to challenge the memory as you say, of the witness, and show them what are inconsistent statements and then have them try to explain why they're inconsistent before the jury so sine glass now that the jury has left for the day, is challenging how much trum
you pronounce emil and they told me me all but i forgot to ask about beauvais. all right. and any case just so you know what's going on right now. so the assistant mr. good job steinglass is objecting and getting into the objection. they had about bove a's line of questioning when it came to david pecker steinglass is right now arguing that bobi's questions about the fbi interview were quote improper and left the jury with a miss impression. steinglass objecting to beauvais trying to seemingly...